I don't comment on dd's......like ever but its funny to see most if not all the people complaining are "straight" males I put that in quotes because you wouldn't care if you are actually comfortable with your sexuality and its not art XD yeah ok but all the naked ladies thats a ok with you guys which makes the naked lady photos responses just that much more creepy! if you are a boy,girl or other we have all/will see things like this at some point no need to flip out! This reminds me of a time when I was talking to some people about anime boobs and why so many girls have a problem with them when I myself don't and I was told something that opened my eyes a little and what they said was girls grow up having boobs and butts and other things forced on them so they don't really care but any time trying to do the same with a man and boys will throw a fit about it and that's why it annoys so many girls...I am not annoyed by it but now I get it! its the lack of actual equality in things like this in art and media and looking at these comments from you boys tells me she was right to a T!...... and lastly Narmus this is a beautiful photo very nicely done and good job or getting a dd happy holidays
Okay, guys, we get it. It's a nude man with a hand on his unmentionables.
Just drop it.
You're all so worried about the nudity and whatnot that you're not taking the time to appreciate this as a piece of artwork. If you guys can't deal with the nude man, then you shouldn't be viewing deviations labeled "mature content." And if you can't be mature with your comments, then don't comment. I'm sure you could all be doing something better with your time than making yourselves all look bad.
It's not worth complaining about how your poor virgin eyes were burned from your skulls. I do specifically remember seeing this deviation's Mature Content Filter on, saying "Warning, contains nudity." To be perfectly honest, if you were really that concerned about seeing a naked man, you wouldn't have even viewed the photo.
For a photographer who chose to share this with you to have you lash out at them just because of nudity is pretty disrespectful, especially since some of you have galleries overflowing with nude photography.
Next time, I hope you all can just keep you hateful comments to yourselves. Thank you.
Sigh... Honestly, I am fed up with people saying nude posing is not art.
The human body is a beautiful thing, and when it is captured as wonderfully as this photograph, it deserves praise.
I can understand how some may not see the grace and the elegance of the human body, whether it be male or female, but please, try not to be so closed minded. Taking nude pictures is not merely the pressing of a button and the snapping of a picture. It is a careful calculation of position, lighting, texture, background, expression, angle, tone, and many more factors to be considered. When many, if not all, of those aspects are achieved, it deserves praise.
you say that this is not art, but when i look at your page all i see is soft core porn of furry animals. i get that that is a fetish, but what makes a nude photo not art but furry porn is? does it not occur to you that almost all famous artist have at least one nude something of someone? there are nude sculptures and paintings, and sexual poetry. all this is considered art when it is sexual, but an innocent nude photo isn't? you should probably gain some intelligence before you post shit like this.
Now did I say porn? or FURRY porn? no I said pin up there is a difference just because I prickled a few butts don't mean you have to become all uppity. How about YOU gain some intelligence to know the difference between what someone says and what you tell yourself they said first cupcake.
And i totally understand the DD. It has beautiful composition, lighting, and i like that his expression isnt sexy or duchy.
The thing that wouldve made this better, was if he didnt cover himself. I mean, if we allow full frontal nudity with women, WHY not men? Seriously. Im so annoyed with this community. Why does always men think they are fully justified to express their sexual desires through naked, often unrealistic women, while the second it's a naked man on the front page, thats suddenly disgusting?
Lets get something clear: art, if made as art, is and always will be art.